This video features Worst and Slowest Muscle Cars Ever. If you wanna know which are Worst and Slowest Muscle Cars Ever watch this video and if you like the …
NJ auto repair shop
48 Replies to “Worst and Slowest Muscle Cars Ever”
Comments are closed.
Would you rather drive a Hyundai?
Looks like a nova
They still look beautiful !
But the performance is a bummer.
gto with a 350 don’t count that shit was ass. gto name is legendary don’t ruin it wit the 350
I'd love to have a Daytona charge tf you mean?
4:18 thats not a musle car man its only a small car got an V8 swap
The Volare was the perfect body style in my opinion. And the one i had, the interior and ride was amazing! A built 360 and it was a fun car.
0:05 Looks like Ventura
The AMC was legit. It was so light you didn't need a lot of power to have fun in it. Which I did at 16 and surprised a lot Camaro and Mustang diehards with a few mods and tweaks.
The Mopar V8 is a 318 not a 316. Shows the maker of this video doesn't know jack shit about cars. I'm 67 I was there when all of these were made. Dude stick to talking about 4 cyl metrics.
Yea roast me all u want but I would’ve owned a gremlin gt if I were around bak then I jus would’ve blamed it on all the psychedelic drugs😧👀🤦🏽♂️🤷🏾♂️
HOW the hell can you only get 140 bhp from a 5 litre V8 (mustang 2)? In 74 Europe's Escort RS2000 was 110bhp at 2 litres…And the Pinto engine always was a little agricultural. Shocking engine engineering from Ford US.
One tire fire
I would be glad to own any of these cars . Better wise up and buy these things whether you think they are butt ass ugly or not. They are an investment and they are not making any more of them. And if you don't like what I say go sit your ass in your Kia Sedona.
That Mustang II was a POS.
Someone was jerking off their pecker for the Gremlin segment. Keep both hands on the wheel.
A SLOW muscle car?…..an oxymoron if ever I heard one…That just ain't the case…some manufacturers made some cars later to POSE as muscle…but wasn't really the case, under the hood…what's in the boiler room defines that term.
I thought the gto didn’t look too bad.
The Dodge was a 318cu not 316.
video make is obviously biased against anything Chrysler. Also he is referring to cars that chrysler intended to be cruisers, to be race cars, so its not a fair comparison to name vs performance
All ICE cars will be considered slow in a few years, so why not have a kitschy dog of a muscle car? A few years after that all cars will be autonomous.
You show up to a car show with one of those and you will have the only one there. I have no hate for any of them.
Wow most of these are Chrysler products , Chrysler was even bad back then.
2005-2010 mustang gt’s 300 hp 4.6L v8
ViolaRe / aspen/ magnum / charger had great suspension for driving in later years- I will give them that
I never heard of the 1974 GTO Ventura (The 1st car in the vid) but isn't that just a 1973/74 Chevy Nova with different trim? My dad owned a 1970 Nova and then a 1972 Nova all throughout my childhood, so I can spot those body lines a mile away, the 73/74's looked extremely similar, mostly just changed the back windows past the B pillar.
Sad times for car enthusiasts. This what happens when the US government gets involved with auto manufacturing. F the DOE and EPA.
Does the guy that filmed the gremlin have Parkinson's?
All these cars look customized
Wdym? The pontiac GTO is a super nice car. This dude must have been grasping on straws when he made this video
hmm, seems we have different opinions on what a muscle car is/was. In m opinion I didn't see a simcle muscle car in the bunch.
Even a slant six valiant could be fast with turbocharging. Blow thru carbs were less understood in the 70s, 80s. So these cars are now interesting, with their 8.5:1 cr. Jusr keep boost below 10 because of the cast internals. When off the boost, gas and insurance would be cheap, unlike a traditional muscle car.
It's it really a muscle car then?
Why were all the HP numbers so low on these V8’s
Meanwhile, the Little Red Express Truck by Dodge in 1978 pulled a better 1/4 mile than a Corvette. Why? Because trucks were not subject to the emissions systems. Remove the choking emissions, tune up the carb, and add dual exhaust you got another 50 to 70 hp. By the way the Chrysler engine was a 318, not a 316. They manufactured it for 40 years. It was very dependable and if you put some cash in it you could make a head snapper out of it.
Shite video filmed with a potato
Since when was a Volarie a muscle car in any world 🙂
Honestly they are all not too bad.A few mods and you there power wise.To me it seems like its already been done though so they beautiful,judt the gremlin is an ugly body
ANYTHING after 1972 from the Factory was CRAP, a Pontiac 455 putting out about ONLY 230 HP. J.U.N.K.
I remember my 1979 magnum gt it was loaded with factory options except engine horse power only a 318 lean burn . with in 9 months i collected a rebuilt a 440-4v and a 727 QF trans only had to modify the left side motor mount bracket . i had plenty of HP under the hood . one option that no other magnum had was extended urethane fender flares very rare. Car was white w/thin red pin stripe , great riding for long trips even the 440 was good turning 3.21 gears
9 1/4 posi all 4 disc . i ordered the fender badges "440 MAGNUM " it fit the combination great . At 3600 lbs it was a sleeper i raced a buick grand national which i barely beat. My friends called the magnum the" flying white refrigerator " i ran one night on the Florida turnpike stretch putting the speedo needle straight down on the odometer about 160 MPH , max reading was 140 . i love that car till the rust monster ate it and i scrapped it in 1990 motor and transmission then got install in a 1980 Plymouth trail duster lifted w40 " tires and 1 ton axles . end of my going fast days , beginning of getting muddy days which still do till present day of 56 years of age plus no more speeding tickets since . i now own a 1975 power wagon dually w/ 5.9 Cummins equipped w/40k pto rear winch 200 ft.1/2 cable, 35" tires. owned since 1989 and gets driven every weekend to my hunting camp / property 89 miles away . i still ponder seeing the 70's – 80's cars and times. It sucks getting old.How is the Gremlon a muscle car?
All of these cars are slow because they are mid-to-late 70's cars. That said, some of the fastest classic muscle cars were the very early 70's cars.
I feel a bit bad for these owners baby's getting shit on. A couple thousand and smog removal would bring em back to life as any gearhead knows though
That dodge charger Daytona was ugly as Sin
Mine was fast after a little love olds power
Buy the car and build the engine up yourself the way you wanted it. If you had the money. Or keep it stock for fuel economy. Simple.
Why wasn't the mid '70s Corvette in this video … They had 180 horsepower? Any and every mid '70s muscle car was anemic by law not choice.
driving age teenagers knew those were faux muscle cars